Secure upload portal

Controlled inbound files

A secure file upload portal, with a clear route back to your team

Collect sensitive documents from clients, suppliers and applicants without asking them to improvise. Each upload can be linked to the intended exchange, recipient and access conditions.

One route inInstead of a shared mailbox
No capLarge submissions without a workaround
NamedYou know who uploaded what
RecordedArrival time and contents retained

The upload journey

Secure file upload without a public drop zone

The person uploading is usually outside your organisation and using your system for the first time. The path has to be short enough that they complete it and controlled enough that you can rely on what arrives.

  • Select. The file, bundle or complete folder, whatever its size.
  • Enter the route. A named, protected path instead of a public mailbox.
  • Upload with progress. Visible confirmation that something is happening.
  • Store and record. Governed destination, with arrival details retained.

Where intake matters

Six collection points worth taking off email.

These are the flows where a shared mailbox is doing work it was never designed for, usually holding sensitive material indefinitely with no clear owner.

A mailbox is not an intake process

Shared inboxes accumulate personal and commercial data, grant access to whoever has the credentials and rarely have a retention rule anybody applies.

Client onboarding

Identity documents, proof of address and signed agreements from people using your systems for the first time.

Supplier submissions

Tender responses, specifications and compliance documentation arriving against a deadline.

Recruitment

Applications, references and right-to-work documents, all carrying personal data with a defined retention need.

Claims and case files

Evidence, photographs and reports from customers or third parties, often large and unstructured.

Project delivery

Drawings, datasets and media from contractors, where size alone rules out email.

Two ways to receive a file

The difference shows up when somebody asks what you were sent.

Both routes get the file to you. Only one of them leaves you able to say who sent it, when it arrived and what has happened to it since.

Shared mailbox

What collecting by email costs

Convenient to set up, and progressively harder to govern as volume and sensitivity build.

  • Anyone with the credentials. Access is to the mailbox, not to a specific submission.
  • No size headroom. Large submissions arrive split, compressed or not at all.
  • Nothing expires. Attachments remain until somebody manually clears them.
  • Attribution by header. Sender identity rests on an address that was typed in.
Controlled intake

What a governed route gives you

A defined path with an owner, a record and controls that match the sensitivity of what you are collecting.

  • Named submitters. You know who uploaded, not just which address it came from.
  • Any size. Complete folders and large media without an improvised workaround.
  • Defined retention. Material has an expected lifetime from the moment it lands.
  • An arrival record. Time, contents and submitter retained together.

Designing the intake

Four decisions that determine whether people use it.

An upload route competes with an email address that already works. It has to be at least as easy, or the mailbox quietly wins and you have deployed a portal nobody sends to.

01

Decide what you are asking for

Be specific about which documents you need and in what form. Vague requests produce partial submissions, repeated exchanges and frustrated senders. A clear list also supports minimisation, because you collect what the purpose requires instead of whatever the person decides to send.

02

Make the first step obvious

The submitter should understand within a few seconds what to do and roughly how long it will take. Anything that requires an explanation from your team is a step you will pay for repeatedly, in support time and in submissions that never arrive.

03

Plan for failure

Test what happens with an oversized file, an interrupted connection, an expired invitation and a restricted device. Each should produce a clear message and a route to a person. A dead end at this point usually ends with the material arriving by email instead.

04

Decide where it goes next

Intake is not storage. Define who owns arriving material, where it moves to and how long it stays in the collection point. Without that, a portal becomes the same accumulation problem as the mailbox it replaced, just with better access control.

What the submitter does

Four steps, from their side of the exchange.

Written from the perspective of somebody who does not work for you, has not used the system before and is doing this between two other tasks.

Step 01

Receive the request

A clear invitation stating what is needed and roughly how long it takes.

Step 02

Add the files

Whatever the size, including a folder, without installing anything.

Step 03

Confirm identity

A verification step proportionate to what is being collected.

Step 04

Get confirmation

Visible acknowledgement that it arrived, so nobody sends it twice by email.

The quiet benefit

A good intake route improves your data protection position and your service at the same time.

Collecting only what you asked for, from a person you can identify, with a known retention period, is a minimisation and accountability improvement. It also happens to look more professional to the client.

One routeInstead of an accumulating shared mailbox
AttributedSubmissions tied to a named sender
BoundedA defined lifetime from arrival
- INSERT TESTIMONIALS -
- INSERT ESSENTIAL READS -
- INSERT FAQs -

Governed collection

Replace the shared mailbox for one intake workflow.

Start a seven-day trial for up to five users, or ask for a demonstration built around your onboarding or supplier submission process.

View in