Anonymise
Identifying context and metadata are separated from the payload. An isolated fragment is not intended to reveal what the file is, who sent it or why it matters.
Used across 1,000+ tier-one supplier relationships
Secure enterprise file sharing, governed at scale
Give departments, regions and external partners one controlled route for sensitive file exchange. My MX Data combines named-user access, policy controls and structured audit evidence with a patented quantum secure methodology, helping security and information-governance teams keep enterprise file transfer explainable without turning it into a document-management project.
Book an enterprise demo
Start a free trial
30 minutes, shaped around your workflows and controls.
Supports GDPR and ISO-aligned processes
AES-256 plus ASR methodology
Unlimited file sizes
Dedicated onboarding support
Region lock enforced
Audit export ready
MX enterprise command centre
ORG LIVE
0Active seats
0Teams under policy
0Storage regions live
Transfer volume150K this week
LIVE ACTIVITY
UK-01EU-02CUSTOM
Securing exchanges for
150K+ files secured weekly
150K+ files secured weekly
The enterprise reality
Enterprise file sharing becomes difficult to defend when workarounds take over.
At scale, risk rarely starts with one failed system. It grows when the approved route is slower or less clear than email, personal cloud accounts or public links. A governed corporate file-sharing process should make the safer route the practical route.
THE REALITY
Shadow tools fill the gap
When approved enterprise file transfer software creates too much friction, teams may select their own transfer services or personal cloud accounts.
Hover or tap to fix it
WITH MX
MX gives teams one secure enterprise file transfer route with named users, controlled access and no public file links.
THE REALITY
Email becomes the archive
Sensitive attachments can remain in inboxes and forwarded threads long after the immediate business purpose has ended.
Hover or tap to fix it
WITH MX
MX replaces the attachment with a controlled exchange. Expiry dates, download settings and named access limit unnecessary continuing availability.
THE REALITY
Copies outlive the project
General-purpose synchronisation can create additional copies across devices and locations, increasing the governance and retention burden.
Hover or tap to fix it
WITH MX
MX is focused on controlled handoffs rather than permanent storage. Transfer policies, expiry settings and data-location options help keep the workflow proportionate.
THE REALITY
Evidence arrives too late
When a client, auditor or internal risk team asks what happened, evidence may be spread across inboxes, screenshots and unrelated logs.
Hover or tap to fix it
WITH MX
Uploads, views, downloads, restorations and expiry events are recorded as structured evidence that can be searched, reviewed and exported.
Patented quantum secure methodology
ASR adds a controlled protection layer before file data moves.
AES-256 protects data in transit and at rest. My MX Data adds the ASR process to anonymise file data, divide it into encrypted shards and restore it only for the verified named recipient. This complements conventional encrypted file sharing by reducing the exposure associated with moving a complete readable file.
Shard
The anonymised payload is divided into encrypted shards across approved storage regions. An individual shard is not intended to represent a complete usable file.
Restore
The file is restored only after the named recipient has been verified. Restoration, access and delivery activity are then written to the audit trail.
A careful security position: ASR should not be described as invulnerable or as a guarantee of compliance. It is designed to reduce exposure, support data-sovereignty requirements and give enterprise reviewers a clearer, more defensible account of how sensitive files are protected.
Enterprise control
Enterprise controls that remain practical for everyday work.
For organisations comparing enterprise managed file transfer options, the practical test is whether the approved route is usable enough to replace informal sharing. Administrators can apply access, expiry, download and region policies consistently, while teams retain a straightforward way to move large or sensitive files. Review the wider platform features to see how these controls work together.
Central policy control
Define expiry, download and region rules centrally, then apply them consistently across departments and external exchanges.
File expiry
Download limits
Region lock
Departments and teams
Organise named users around departments, projects and operating groups, with permissions that reflect how responsibility is assigned.
FNOPSENG+21
Data-sovereignty options
Select appropriate storage regions for encrypted shards as part of wider contractual, client and governance requirements.
UK-01EU-02CUSTOM
White-labelled experience
Present a controlled exchange route through your organisation’s branding, domain and client-facing workflow.
files.yourbrand.com
Secure upload portals
Give clients and suppliers a focused route for sensitive submissions through a secure upload portal, rather than relying on unmanaged inboxes.
Large-file transfer without arbitrary limits
Move CAD assemblies, media masters, imaging datasets and full archives through the same governed process. See how MX supports controlled large-file sharing.
Conversations tied to the exchange
Keep relevant discussion connected to the file activity and recipient history, rather than separating context across unrelated tools.
Structured enterprise onboarding
Plan ownership, policy and adoption with support for a phased rollout across teams, regions and external partner groups.
Traceability
Activity captured as it happens
Evidence tied to named access
Records prepared for review
A file-exchange record your organisation can stand behind.
When sensitive files cross an enterprise boundary, the important questions often arrive later. MX records uploads, views, downloads, messages, expiry events and restorations as structured evidence that teams can search and export. That record supports more accountable B2B file exchange without depending on inbox searches or manual screenshots.
Relevant events are recorded across internal users and external recipients, helping teams understand the exchange without reconstructing it later.
Each event can be associated with an authorised user, verification state, network detail and timestamp.
Export structured evidence for internal assurance, procurement reviews, client questionnaires or an auditor’s examination.
audit evidence console
EXPORT CSV
12,487events this week
24teams covered
100%named access
09:41:12UPLOAD
s.patel uploaded Board_Pack_Q4.pdf
09:42:03MFA OK
recipient verified through multi factor authentication
09:42:19VIEW
a.whitfield viewed file from approved IP range
09:43:07RESTORE
shards restored for named recipient only
09:43:18EXPORT
audit record prepared for security review
Compliance support
Give reviewers clearer evidence of how sensitive files are controlled.
My MX Data does not make an organisation compliant by itself. It provides access controls, data-location options and audit evidence that can support GDPR-aligned file-sharing processes and a more structured approach to ISO 27001-aligned information security. Policy, lawful use, retention and people remain the organisation’s responsibility.
Plain-language position: MX helps facilitate compliance through encryption, named access, sovereignty controls and audit evidence. Those capabilities contribute to a stronger compliance posture, but they do not replace legal advice, internal policy or independent certification.
GDPR
Named access, encryption, expiry controls and activity records can support accountability around the handling of personal data.
ISO 27001
Controlled transfer workflows and exportable evidence can support information-security controls within an organisation’s wider management system.
UK Data Protection Act
Recipient controls and regional storage options can assist organisations in applying appropriate measures to sensitive exchanges.
Cyber Essentials Plus
Authentication and governed transfer paths can contribute to a stronger cyber-security posture. Certification depends on the wider technical environment and assessment.
SOC 2 principles
Access control, availability and traceability features can support relevant trust-services criteria. The organisation’s own controls and independent examination remain determinative.
Protection that can be explained
AES-256 protection and the ASR methodology give reviewers a clearer account of how file data is protected in transit, at rest and during restoration.
Named-recipient control
Files are made available to authorised individuals rather than distributed through open public links, with relevant activity recorded.
No public file links
Open URLs are not the default exchange model, reducing the risk of uncontrolled forwarding and access that remains available for too long.
Structured activity logs
Uploads, views, downloads, messages and restoration events are recorded so that later questions can be answered with evidence.
Controlled external intake
Collect sensitive files through a branded, governed route instead of asking clients or suppliers to select their own transfer method.
Consistent control for large files
Apply the same recipient, expiry and audit controls to large archives, datasets and media files as to ordinary business documents.
Customer perspective
Confidence comes from a process people can understand and use.
The platform feels precise, not overloaded, and that gave staff confidence right away. It's rare to find something both highly secure and easy to live with day to day.
CH
Caroline H.Head of IT Security
4.8/5 G2 rating
150K+ weekly exchanges
10K+ active users
1000+ tier-1 suppliers
Controlled adoption
Start with one sensitive workflow, then scale with evidence.
Enterprise rollout works best when the first use case is specific, owned and measurable. Begin with one team, agree the controls that matter, then extend the route once users and reviewers are confident in the process. Organisations can compare enterprise pricing options before wider deployment.
01
Pilot
Select one team and one category of sensitive exchange. Test the route with real files, named users and agreed success measures.
02
Team rollout
Apply the agreed access, expiry, download and audit settings to a department, with ownership and support clearly assigned.
03
Organisation-wide
Extend central policies across teams and regions while keeping the user journey consistent and the evidence searchable.
04
Extended enterprise
Bring suppliers, clients and partners into a governed exchange route without asking each party to choose its own transfer service.
Product walkthrough
See a governed enterprise file exchange from upload to restore.
Follow a sensitive file through named-recipient verification, the ASR process, policy controls and the audit record. The walkthrough focuses on the questions security, governance and operations teams need to answer.
2:25 · Product walkthrough
Enterprise review questions
What buyers usually need to establish before rollout.
These answers cover governance, implementation, supplier access and the relationship between MX and existing enterprise systems.
Talk to the teamEnterprise provisioning should give administrators clear ownership without turning each routine change into a support project. MX uses named users, so access can be associated with an identifiable person rather than an open link. Users can be organised around departments, projects or operating groups, with relevant policies applied consistently.
A practical rollout normally begins with the exchanges that carry the greatest sensitivity or create the largest evidence gap. The organisation can then define who approves access, when expiry or download restrictions apply, and how inactive users or completed projects are reviewed. This supports proportionate administration while reducing the pressure for informal workarounds.
My MX Data provides data-sovereignty options that allow organisations to select appropriate regions for encrypted shards. This can support contractual, client and internal governance requirements where the location of sensitive information matters.
Location controls should still be considered alongside lawful processing, supplier due diligence, retention and access policy. The ASR process changes how file data is separated and restored, but it does not determine compliance on its own. The ICO’s data-protection-by-design guidance provides useful context for combining technical and organisational measures.
A review should look beyond encryption. Buyers usually need to understand identity controls, data locations, audit evidence, expiry settings, operational ownership and the way the service fits alongside existing systems. MX is positioned as a secure exchange layer, so the review can focus on the specific risk created when sensitive files move between known users.
Relevant evidence may include AES-256 protection, the patented quantum secure methodology, named-recipient verification, the absence of public file links and structured activity records. These controls can support governance and compliance objectives, but the organisation remains responsible for policy, lawful use and people. The NCSC cloud security principles can also help frame shared-responsibility questions.
Not usually. Those platforms remain useful for storage, synchronisation, productivity and day-to-day collaboration. MX is intended for the exchanges that need greater recipient control, stronger traceability and a process that is easier to defend later.
Many organisations keep their existing productivity stack and use MX as the approved route for sensitive external handoffs, large operational files or regulated workflows. Where the primary requirement is live co-authoring or synchronisation, the organisation should assess an enterprise collaboration workflow separately from controlled file exchange.
External parties can exchange files with named users or submit information through a branded upload experience. This gives the organisation a consistent route for supplier and client data instead of allowing every external party to select an unrelated transfer service.
The receiving team gains clearer ownership and activity evidence, while the sender receives a focused route for delivering the required material. The aim is to reduce unmanaged attachments, public links and manual chasing without forcing external users through unnecessary document-management complexity.
Enterprise rollout should begin with clear ownership and a manageable first use case. Onboarding support can help teams plan access, expiry, download and location requirements, then test the process with real users before extending it across departments or supplier groups.
This avoids treating implementation as a purely technical deployment. Security, governance, operations and procurement stakeholders can validate the workflow together. Organisations can begin with a seven-day UK trial or discuss a managed rollout with the MX team.
Controlled enterprise file exchange
Bring sensitive file movement under clearer control.
Book a focused walkthrough of the enterprise platform, or test the workflow with a seven-day trial. The aim is to establish whether MX gives your organisation a more controlled, traceable and usable route for sensitive file exchange.